Central American vs Pakistani Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Pakistani
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Pakistanis
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Pakistani Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,239,652 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.96%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 10.3% | 23.0% |
| Range | 9.0% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.4% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Pakistanis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |