Immigrants from Belize vs Guatemalan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Guatemalan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Guatemalans
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Guatemalan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,278,815 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,275,877 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.37% |
| Maximum | 9.1% | 9.5% |
| Range | 8.7% | 9.2% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 0.57% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Guatemalans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |