Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Cherokee
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Cherokee
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cherokee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,193,333 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,554,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 42.0%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 60.0% |
| Range | 27.4% | 53.3% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 22.7% |
| Median | 10.5% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 25.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Ecuador (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Tongans | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Seminole (14.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |