Hungarian vs Celtic Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Hungarian
 Celtic
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Hungarians
Celtics
16.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Celtic Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,167,723 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Celtic | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 40.9% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 39.9% | 48.7% | 
| Mean | 16.1% | 16.4% | 
| Median | 15.5% | 15.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 13.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 6.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Cuban (16.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belarus (16.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (16.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (16.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Macedonian (16.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 16.4%  | 
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 16.4%  | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Cubans | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.8 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.8 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.8 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 99.8 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 16.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164  | Good 17.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165  | Good 17.2%  |