Maltese vs Celtic Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Maltese
Celtic
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Maltese
Celtics
16.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Celtic Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,468,065 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 5.6%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Celtic |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 50.0% |
| Range | 14.6% | 48.7% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 16.4% |
| Median | 15.0% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (16.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Austria (16.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Greece (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Scotland (16.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |