Guamanian/Chamorro vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Bhutanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Bhutanese
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,861,125 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,292,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 15.2% | 10.5% |
Range | 14.0% | 8.8% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Bhutanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Serbian (3.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Central American Indian (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Austria (3.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and German Russian (3.3%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |