Romanian vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
 Bhutanese
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Romanians
Bhutanese
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,801,954 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,292,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 2.3%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Bhutanese | 
| Minimum | 0.091% | 1.7% | 
| Maximum | 24.7% | 10.5% | 
| Range | 24.6% | 8.8% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 4.0% | 
| Median | 3.3% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 1.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Bhutanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213  | Poor 3.1%  | 
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229  | Tragic 3.2%  |