British vs Indonesian Vision Disability
COMPARE
British
 Indonesian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
British
Indonesians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
25.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
9.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Indonesian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,471,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,708,643 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Indonesian | 
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 64.6% | 4.0% | 
| Range | 64.1% | 3.7% | 
| Mean | 7.1% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 3.0% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 0.71% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 0.74% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 0.73% | 
Demographics Similar to British and Indonesians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are European (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.57%), German (2.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% | 
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% | 
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |