Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Nigerian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Nigerians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,578,519 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Nigerian |
Minimum | 0.51% | 0.62% |
Maximum | 39.0% | 14.0% |
Range | 38.5% | 13.4% |
Mean | 4.3% | 2.6% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Nigerians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |