Creek vs Pima Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Creek
Pima
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Creek
Pima
30.2%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Pima Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,280,252 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,525,025 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 27.8%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Pima |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 19.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.6% | 80.6% |
| Mean | 41.9% | 49.6% |
| Median | 35.9% | 40.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.7% | 28.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.3% | 70.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 42.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.2% | 27.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 26.6% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Pima by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Chickasaw (30.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Choctaw (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Native/Alaskan (30.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and Colville (30.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (37.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 7.1%), Inupiat (34.5%, a difference of 11.8%), Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 16.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |