Immigrants from South Africa vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Inupiat
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Inupiat
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,268,950 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Inupiat |
Minimum | 0.47% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 18.0% |
Range | 26.8% | 16.9% |
Mean | 7.8% | 5.4% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |