Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Scotland Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Immigrants from Scotland
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Scotland
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Scotland Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,324,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 52.1%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Scotland | 
| Minimum | 0.33% | 0.21% | 
| Maximum | 15.2% | 7.9% | 
| Range | 14.8% | 7.7% | 
| Mean | 5.4% | 2.3% | 
| Median | 4.6% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 1.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 3.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 3.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 3.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 3.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128  | Excellent 2.1%  |