Cherokee vs Navajo Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Navajo
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Navajo
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Navajo Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,069,891 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,647,940 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 8.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Navajo |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 10.7% |
| Range | 18.1% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 3.9% |
| Median | 4.2% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Navajo by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 2.0%), Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Paiute (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |