Cherokee vs Paiute Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Paiute
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Paiute
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Paiute Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,069,891 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,384,009 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paiute and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Paiute |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 13.8% |
| Range | 18.1% | 13.4% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Paiute by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 2.0%), Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Comanche (2.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Comanche (2.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Black/African American (2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and Tohono O'odham (2.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |