Central American vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Central American
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Central Americans
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,492,457 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 4.9%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 27.9% | 40.3% |
| Range | 19.6% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 18.5% |
| Median | 17.3% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Alsatian (17.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Fijian (17.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Vietnamese (17.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Zimbabwean (17.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Okinawans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |