Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,627,878 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 9.1%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 40.3% |
Range | 16.5% | 38.0% |
Mean | 14.1% | 18.5% |
Median | 14.6% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |