Celtic vs Creek Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Creek
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Celtics
Creek
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Creek Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,450,672 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 6.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 28.9% |
| Range | 48.7% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 17.7% |
| Median | 15.8% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ghanaian (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (18.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |