Burmese vs Bolivian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Bolivian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Bolivians
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Bolivian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,650,218 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 13.1% |
| Range | 22.5% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Bolivians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |