Burmese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Ethiopia
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,510,765 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 8.4% |
| Range | 22.5% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |