Brazilian vs Palestinian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Palestinian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Palestinians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Palestinian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,454,064 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.69%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 0.82% | 0.070% |
| Maximum | 7.3% | 6.8% |
| Range | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.65% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Palestinians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |