Bolivian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bolivian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bolivians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,650,218 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,955,040 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 5.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 8.4% |
| Range | 12.0% | 7.4% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.4% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |