Blackfeet vs Czechoslovakian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Czechoslovakian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Blackfeet
Czechoslovakians
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Czechoslovakian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,445,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,630,521 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 1.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.91% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 44.0% |
| Range | 24.7% | 41.8% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 7.8% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Czechoslovakians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 0.34%), French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |