Iroquois vs Czechoslovakian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Iroquois
 Czechoslovakian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Iroquois
Czechoslovakians
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Czechoslovakian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,234,174 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,630,521 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Czechoslovakian | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.1% | 
| Maximum | 40.9% | 44.0% | 
| Range | 38.9% | 41.8% | 
| Mean | 8.8% | 7.8% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 7.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Czechoslovakians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.36%), White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Danish (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.82%), Basque (3.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |