Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,296,626 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,685,552 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.623 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from El Salvador
Minimum	1.5%	3.7%
Maximum	17.5%	14.9%
Range	16.0%	11.3%
Mean	9.7%	9.3%
Median	9.4%	9.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.2%	7.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.1%	10.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	3.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	2.4%

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Immigrants from El Salvador by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Brazilian (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Morocco (10.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Nepal (10.6%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Syria (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Brazilians	96.9 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 10.5%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	96.8 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 10.5%
Tongans	96.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Morocco	96.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	96.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	95.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	95.5 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 10.6%
Luxembourgers	95.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 10.6%
Vietnamese	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 10.6%
Romanians	95.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Norway	95.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 10.6%
Maltese	94.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 10.6%
Estonians	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 10.6%
Albanians	94.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	94.1 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 10.6%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	94.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 10.6%
South Africans	93.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 10.7%
Ecuadorians	93.1 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| Syria	93.0 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 10.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	92.8 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 10.7%