Armenian vs Sri Lankan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Sri Lankan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Armenians
Sri Lankans
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Sri Lankan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,934,651 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 0.33%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 32.6% |
| Range | 19.9% | 27.2% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 16.8% |
| Median | 16.5% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Sri Lankans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |