Immigrants from Albania vs Sri Lankan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Albania
Sri Lankan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Albania
Sri Lankans
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Albania vs Sri Lankan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,394,902 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 0.50%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Albania | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 11.6% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 24.7% | 32.6% |
| Range | 13.2% | 27.2% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| Median | 16.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Albania and Sri Lankans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Albania are Immigrants from Ecuador (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |