Arab vs Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Arab
Costa Rican
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Arabs
Costa Ricans
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Costa Rican Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,294,602 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,472,399 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 48.5% | 45.1% |
| Range | 45.5% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs and Costa Ricans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |