Canadian vs British Female Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
British
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Canadians
British
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,154,651 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | British |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.3% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 30.0% | 18.5% |
| Median | 16.8% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.7% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.4% | 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |