Yakama vs Scandinavian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Yakama
Scandinavian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Yakama
Scandinavians
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Scandinavian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,905,065 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,073,757 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Scandinavian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 21.2% |
| Range | 10.0% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Scandinavians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Danish (6.6%, a difference of 0.35%), German (6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Mexican (7.0%, a difference of 0.17%), White/Caucasian (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 0.50%), European (7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |