Yakama vs Luxembourger No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Yakama
Luxembourger
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Yakama
Luxembourgers
6.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Luxembourger No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,905,065 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,375,262 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 23.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 11.5% | 8.6% |
Range | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Mean | 5.4% | 3.9% |
Median | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Luxembourgers by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Danish (6.6%, a difference of 0.35%), German (6.7%, a difference of 0.99%), English (6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), English (6.5%, a difference of 21.5%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 23.0%), German (6.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 26.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |