Tsimshian vs Hungarian 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Hungarian
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Tsimshian
Hungarians
56.7%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.5%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Hungarian 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 56.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,946,107 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 56.5%, a difference of 0.28%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Hungarian |
Minimum | 27.8% | 5.2% |
Maximum | 78.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.8% | 94.8% |
Mean | 54.7% | 63.4% |
Median | 55.1% | 64.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.3% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.6% | 79.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.3% | 32.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Hungarians by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Comanche (56.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Ute (56.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Asians | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 57.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 95.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 57.0% |
Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |