Colombian vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Colombian
Tlingit-Haida
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Colombians
Tlingit-Haida
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,339,443 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,779,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.24%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colombian | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 31.4% | 90.9% |
| Range | 30.0% | 90.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 18.5% |
| Median | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 23.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians and Tlingit-Haida by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Uganda (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |