Latvian vs Sioux 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Sioux
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Sioux
90.3%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
90.2%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Sioux 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,666,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 90.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,124,417 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.614 and weighted average of 90.2%, a difference of 0.14%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Sioux |
| Minimum | 75.4% | 55.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 95.5% | 89.3% |
| Median | 96.9% | 93.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 93.4% | 84.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 95.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Sioux by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Syrian (90.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Hungarian (90.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (90.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (90.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Estonian (90.3%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Chilean (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 90.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 88.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 90.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 90.4% |
| Kenyans | 87.0 /100 | #134 | Excellent 90.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 86.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 90.4% |
| Hungarians | 86.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 90.3% |
| Latvians | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 90.3% |
| Syrians | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 90.3% |
| Estonians | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 90.3% |
| Sudanese | 85.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 90.3% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 81.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Sioux | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Bahamians | 80.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 90.2% |
| Chileans | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 90.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 78.2 /100 | #148 | Good 90.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 76.7 /100 | #149 | Good 90.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 90.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 75.4 /100 | #151 | Good 90.1% |