Jordanian vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Jordanian
Cuban
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Jordanians
Cubans
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 0.22%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Cuban |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 20.7% |
| Range | 12.5% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Cubans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |