Italian vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from Cuba
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 569,049,738 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 0.90%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from Cuba |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 25.3% |
Range | 40.6% | 24.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 8.0% |
Median | 6.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from Cuba by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Jordan (8.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |