Osage vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Cuba
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,756,472 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 0.14%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Cuba |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 25.3% |
| Range | 12.7% | 24.2% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 8.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Cuba by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |