Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Cuba
8.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Cuba No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,640,545 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,235,999 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Immigrants from Cuba |
Minimum | 0.76% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 25.3% |
Range | 12.1% | 24.2% |
Mean | 5.6% | 8.0% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Immigrants from Cuba by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Austrian (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (8.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |