Indian (Asian) vs Salvadoran No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Salvadoran
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Salvadorans
14.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Salvadoran No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,881,185 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,977,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 39.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 74.2% | 25.9% |
| Range | 73.4% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 9.9% |
| Median | 10.1% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.1% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Okinawan (14.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Pima (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Australia (13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Belizean (14.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |