Bolivian vs Salvadoran No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bolivian
Salvadoran
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bolivians
Salvadorans
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Salvadoran No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,519,669 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,977,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 17.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.0% | 25.9% |
| Range | 20.2% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 9.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |