Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Vietnamese 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,723,370 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 37.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,680,365 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 38.5%, a difference of 1.6%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Uzbekistan	Vietnamese
Minimum	3.0%	4.7%
Maximum	90.2%	91.3%
Range	87.1%	86.6%
Mean	49.1%	46.7%
Median	52.0%	50.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	36.2%	31.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	61.9%	60.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	25.7%	29.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.0%	20.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.9%	20.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Vietnamese by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Barbadian (38.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (38.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Immigrants from Barbados (35.8%, a difference of 5.9%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (40.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (40.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Barbadian (38.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (38.8%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (40.3%, a difference of 4.6%), Immigrants from Ecuador (40.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (40.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 42.8%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 42.6%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 42.0%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 41.6%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 41.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 40.9%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 40.5%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 40.3%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 38.8%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 38.5%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 38.3%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 37.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 35.8%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 35.4%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 35.4%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 35.3%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 35.0%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 34.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 33.2%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 28.7%