Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Japanese 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,708,525 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 56.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,112,523 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Central Asia	Japanese
Minimum	11.6%	28.6%
Maximum	90.3%	83.2%
Range	78.7%	54.6%
Mean	58.5%	56.3%
Median	59.5%	57.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	54.4%	49.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	64.8%	63.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.4%	13.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.9%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.9%	10.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Tsimshian (56.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from North America (57.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (57.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Pueblo (57.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (57.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (57.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| North America	98.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 57.5%
Japanese	98.0 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 57.5%
Greeks	98.0 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 57.5%
Pueblo	98.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 57.5%
Zimbabweans	96.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 57.2%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	96.8 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 57.2%
Chippewa	96.6 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 57.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.6 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 57.2%
Iraqis	95.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 57.1%
Asians	95.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 57.0%
Natives/Alaskans	95.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 57.0%
Costa Ricans	94.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 56.9%
Sioux	93.8 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 56.8%
Immigrants \| South Africa	92.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 56.7%
Australians	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 56.7%
New Zealanders	91.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 56.7%
Tsimshian	91.6 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 56.7%
Estonians	90.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 56.6%
Immigrants \| Thailand	90.7 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 56.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 56.6%
Ute	90.4 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 56.6%