Danish vs Crow 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Danish
 Crow
 1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Danes
Crow
93.5%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
89.3%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Crow 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,956,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566 and weighted average of 93.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,203,156 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 89.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
 
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Crow | 
| Minimum | 89.7% | 77.6% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 10.3% | 22.4% | 
| Mean | 98.0% | 93.8% | 
| Median | 98.2% | 95.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 96.9% | 90.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 98.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 8.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 6.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 5.9% | 
Similar Demographics by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Danes by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Yakama (93.6%, a difference of 0.020%), German (93.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Norwegian (93.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Scottish (93.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Swedish (93.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 94.8% | 
| English | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 93.8% | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 93.7% | 
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 93.6% | 
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 93.6% | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 93.5% | 
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 93.4% | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 93.3% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 93.3% | 
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 93.3% | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 93.3% | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 93.1% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 93.1% | 
| Irish | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 93.1% | 
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 93.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Crow by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Sweden (89.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (89.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (89.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (89.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (89.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 37.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 89.5% | 
| Shoshone | 37.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 89.5% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 37.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 89.5% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 36.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 89.5% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 35.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 89.5% | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 33.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 89.4% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 31.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 89.4% | 
| Crow | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 89.3% | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 23.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 89.3% | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 89.3% | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 22.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 89.3% | 
| Central Americans | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 89.2% | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 89.2% | 
| Iroquois | 19.8 /100 | #202 | Poor 89.2% | 
| Cambodians | 18.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 89.2% |