Scottish vs African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Scottish
African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Scottish
Africans
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,431,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,587,703 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 82.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | African |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 37.8% |
| Range | 97.0% | 35.4% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 13.9% |
| Median | 6.3% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 6.6% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Scottish by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and Israeli (12.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Panamanians | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |