Central American vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Central American
Guatemalan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Central Americans
Guatemalans
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,389,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,589,655 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 35.5% |
| Range | 32.6% | 33.2% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 11.7% |
| Median | 10.6% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Guatemalans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
| Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
| Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |