Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Unemployment
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Sudanese
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Zimbabweans
Sudanese
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,106 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,101,890 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 13.3% |
| Range | 7.6% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Sudanese by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| British | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |