Uruguayan vs Ottawa Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Ottawa
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Uruguayans
Ottawa
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
11.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
11.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Ottawa Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,657,332 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,812,692 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Ottawa |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 8.5% | 20.6% |
Range | 7.5% | 18.7% |
Mean | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Ottawa by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Comanche (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Comanche (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 5.4% |
South Americans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 8.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.4% |
Brazilians | 7.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.5% |