Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Ukraine Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,873,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,379,274 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 3.2%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Luxembourger	Immigrants from Ukraine
Minimum	5.3%	1.5%
Maximum	37.6%	13.7%
Range	32.3%	12.2%
Mean	11.2%	6.7%
Median	6.8%	6.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.4%	4.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.6%	8.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.9%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.5%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Ukraine by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Russia (6.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Asian (6.7%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Latvia (6.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Chinese (6.8%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Iran (6.8%, a difference of 0.74%), Ethiopian (6.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Ireland (6.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 6.6%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.6%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.7%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.7%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.7%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 6.8%
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 6.8%
Ethiopians	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Iran	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 6.8%
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	99.8 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 6.8%