Iranian vs Immigrants from Russia Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,710,938 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,851,554 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Iranian	Immigrants from Russia
Minimum	1.5%	2.0%
Maximum	33.3%	40.8%
Range	31.8%	38.8%
Mean	8.4%	9.3%
Median	6.7%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	5.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.7%	9.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.9%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.0%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.9%	8.6%

Demographics Similar to Iranians and Immigrants from Russia by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Australia (6.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Latvian (6.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Asia (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Switzerland (6.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Bhutanese (6.7%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Hmong (6.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (6.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Asian (6.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Indonesia (6.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Luxembourger (6.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 6.6%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 6.6%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 6.6%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.6%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.7%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.7%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.7%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 6.8%
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 6.8%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 6.8%
Ethiopians	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 6.8%