Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Apache Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,346,065 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,222,080 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Apache
Minimum	3.3%	3.1%
Maximum	26.9%	100.0%
Range	23.6%	96.9%
Mean	9.8%	27.7%
Median	8.3%	14.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	7.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.3%	36.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	29.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.8%	33.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.8%	31.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Apache by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Colombian (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are German Russian (8.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (8.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Native Hawaiian (8.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Chilean (8.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Serbian (8.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Native Hawaiians	96.1 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 8.4%
Ghanaians	96.0 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 8.4%
Apache	95.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 8.4%
German Russians	94.9 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 8.4%
Chileans	93.8 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 8.4%
Serbians	93.7 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 8.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	93.4 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 8.4%
Haitians	91.4 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 8.5%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	90.8 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 8.5%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	90.5 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 8.5%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	89.6 /100 \| #138	Excellent 8.5%
Barbadians	88.6 /100 \| #139	Excellent 8.5%
South Americans	87.9 /100 \| #140	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	87.9 /100 \| #141	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	87.0 /100 \| #142	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	86.8 /100 \| #143	Excellent 8.5%
Colombians	86.7 /100 \| #144	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	86.2 /100 \| #145	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	85.8 /100 \| #146	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	85.6 /100 \| #147	Excellent 8.5%
Immigrants \| Colombia	85.6 /100 \| #148	Excellent 8.5%