Immigrants from Europe vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,239,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,741,531 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Europe	Chickasaw
Minimum	1.8%	2.2%
Maximum	12.2%	100.0%
Range	10.4%	97.8%
Mean	6.7%	31.1%
Median	6.7%	16.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.6%	8.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.1%	50.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	41.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.6%	28.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.6%	28.5%

Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Russian (7.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (7.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Albanians	98.0 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 7.2%
New Zealanders	97.8 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 7.2%
Macedonians	97.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 7.2%
Romanians	97.7 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	97.7 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	97.6 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 7.2%
Russians	97.5 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Europe	97.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	97.4 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 7.2%
Chileans	97.4 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	97.3 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	97.3 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Egypt	97.2 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 7.2%
Venezuelans	97.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	97.2 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 7.2%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Creek (8.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Jamaica (8.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Tlingit-Haida (8.9%, a difference of 0.83%), Hispanic or Latino (9.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from West Indies (9.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 8.8%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 8.9%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 8.9%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 8.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 8.9%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 8.9%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 9.0%
Hispanics or Latinos	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 9.0%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 9.1%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 9.1%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 9.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 9.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 9.1%